EDV vs. JHAC
EDV (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF) and JHAC (John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while JHAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock. EDV is passively managed, while JHAC is actively managed. Over the past year, EDV returned 4.85% vs 8.86% for JHAC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for JHAC.
Performance
EDV vs. JHAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than JHAC's -0.25% return.
EDV
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.25%
- 5Y*
- -10.02%
- 10Y*
- -3.32%
JHAC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 8.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDV vs. JHAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | -0.72% | 0.65% | -12.78% | 20.95% |
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | -0.25% | 3.33% | 23.65% | 15.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDV and JHAC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDV vs. JHAC — Risk / Return Rank
EDV
JHAC
EDV vs. JHAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDV | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.12 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 1.82 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDV | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.67 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.93 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
EDV vs. JHAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, which is greater than JHAC's maximum drawdown of -24.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and JHAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDV | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.96% | -24.43% | -35.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -15.24% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.45% | -3.96% | -50.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -3.91% | -19.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 4.87% | +0.51% |
Volatility
EDV vs. JHAC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF (JHAC) at 3.04%. This indicates that EDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDV | JHAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.04% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 9.71% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 13.28% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 17.45% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 17.45% | +2.36% |
EDV vs. JHAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JHAC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDV vs. JHAC - Dividend Comparison
EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than JHAC's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 4.99% | 4.94% | 4.65% | 3.81% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% |
JHAC John Hancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.66% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDV and JHAC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to JHAC (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDV dropped -59.96% vs JHAC's -24.43%.
On 1-year performance, JHAC leads with 8.86% vs 4.85% for EDV. On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JHAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JHAC has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for JHAC.
EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.58% for JHAC.
EDV is categorized as Government Bonds, while JHAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for EDV and 0.72% for JHAC.
JHAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDV and JHAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer