EDU vs. AMDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDU (New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.) is a stock, while AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, EDU returned 3.81% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EDU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDU achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.

EDU

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -11.34%
• YTD: -14.38%
• 6M: -7.82%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: -12.19%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

AMDL

• 1D: 8.25%
• 1M: 135.69%
• YTD: 395.18%
• 6M: 371.52%
• 1Y: 1,189.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.	-14.38%	-13.27%	-29.25%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	395.18%	103.00%	-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EDU and AMDL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.20

Return for Risk

EDU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDU

EDU Risk / Return Rank: 42
EDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
EDU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EDU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDU	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	9.30	-9.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	4.81	-4.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.63	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	21.43	-21.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	42.08	-41.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDU vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 9.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDU and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDU	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	9.30	-9.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.56	-0.34

Drawdowns

EDU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDU drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than AMDL's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDU and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDU	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.61%	-88.63%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.06%	-56.13%	+29.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.54%	0.00%	-75.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.98%	-48.58%	+15.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.60%	28.53%	-16.93%

Volatility

EDU vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) is 10.07%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that EDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDU	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.07%	46.02%	-35.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.47%	94.09%	-70.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.65%	129.41%	-91.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.50%	116.59%	-45.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.60%	116.59%	-56.99%

Dividends

EDU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

EDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.	2.58%	1.09%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.46%	0.00%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDU and AMDL in my portfolio?

EDU and AMDL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDU or AMDL?

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to EDU (10.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDU dropped -95.61% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.