PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOW vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOW vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


EDOW

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.18%
YTD
5.68%
6M
5.68%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOW vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
5.68%15.46%13.17%15.47%-7.45%18.82%6.64%24.69%-2.04%11.90%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%19.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOW and OILK is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017

0.20

The correlation between EDOW and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDOW vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOW
OILK

Technology

20.0%

-

Financial Services

17.5%

-

Industrials

13.6%

-

Healthcare

13.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%

-

Communication Services

6.5%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

EDOW
20.0%
OILK

-

Financial Services

EDOW
17.5%
OILK

-

Industrials

EDOW
13.6%
OILK

-

Healthcare

EDOW
13.4%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

EDOW
12.7%
OILK
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

EDOW
9.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

EDOW
6.5%
OILK

-

Energy

EDOW
3.3%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

EDOW
3.3%
OILK

-

Real Estate

EDOW

-

OILK

-

Utilities

EDOW

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOW vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOW
EDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOW vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOWOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.42

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

6.91

+0.97

EDOW vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOW and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOWOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.06

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.59

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.12

+0.52

Drawdowns

EDOW vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOWOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-83.76%

+50.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-17.35%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-23.42%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-34.69%

+12.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-3.66%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-32.61%

+28.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

8.56%

-6.21%

Volatility

EDOW vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is 2.74%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that EDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOWOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

10.44%

-7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

23.26%

-15.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.68%

28.75%

-18.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

30.12%

-15.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

35.97%

-18.23%

EDOW vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOW vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDOW
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
1.24%1.31%1.65%1.93%1.91%1.52%1.84%1.88%1.82%0.75%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOW and OILK have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to EDOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOW dropped -33.72% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 8.89% for EDOW. On fees, EDOW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EDOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDOW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.24% for EDOW.

EDOW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. EDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrail Average Equal Weight TR, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOW and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer