EDOW vs. AFOS
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
EDOW vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOW vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 5.68% | 10.64% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and AFOS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
AFOS
EDOW vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 4.35 | -3.71 |
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -11.52% | -22.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.29% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -1.37% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
EDOW vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 20.19% | -9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 20.19% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 20.19% | -2.45% |
EDOW vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and AFOS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.
EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer