EDOW vs. AFOS
EDOW (First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, EDOW returned 18.40% vs 83.17% for AFOS. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDOW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
EDOW vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOW achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.60% return.
EDOW
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 33.60%
- 6M
- 31.56%
- 1Y
- 83.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOW vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 6.26% | 11.42% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 33.60% | 37.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOW and AFOS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOW vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
EDOW
AFOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDOW vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOW vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOW drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOW and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -11.52% | -22.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -11.52% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -2.33% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -1.43% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility
EDOW vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOW | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 21.58% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 21.58% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 21.58% | -3.88% |
EDOW vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOW vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
EDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDOW First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF | 1.53% | 1.31% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 1.91% | 1.52% | 1.84% | 1.88% | 1.82% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOW and AFOS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 83.17% vs 18.40% for EDOW. On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 83.17% return vs 18.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EDOW.
EDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EDOW and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for EDOW and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer