PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDOG vs. ECOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDOG vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 13.10% return.


EDOG

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.44%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
6.26%

ECOW

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.29%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOG vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
2.43%22.59%1.70%11.58%-10.50%11.71%7.99%4.67%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.10%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%-2.51%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOG and ECOW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.71

The correlation between EDOG and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDOG vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDOG
ECOW

Energy

14.0%
16.1%

Industrials

11.9%
15.5%

Communication Services

10.5%
18.4%

Healthcare

10.5%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
8.5%

Basic Materials

9.8%
9.6%

Technology

9.2%
9.8%

Utilities

8.8%
7.9%

Financial Services

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
12.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

EDOG
14.0%
ECOW
16.1%

Industrials

EDOG
11.9%
ECOW
15.5%

Communication Services

EDOG
10.5%
ECOW
18.4%

Healthcare

EDOG
10.5%
ECOW
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

EDOG
9.9%
ECOW
8.5%

Basic Materials

EDOG
9.8%
ECOW
9.6%

Technology

EDOG
9.2%
ECOW
9.8%

Utilities

EDOG
8.8%
ECOW
7.9%

Financial Services

EDOG
7.8%
ECOW

-

Consumer Cyclical

EDOG
7.6%
ECOW
12.5%

Real Estate

EDOG

-

ECOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDOG vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOG
EDOG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOG vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDOGECOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.46

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

4.25

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

15.39

-10.61

EDOG vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOG and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDOGECOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.50

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.37

-0.14

Drawdowns

EDOG vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, which is greater than ECOW's maximum drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and ECOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDOGECOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-40.27%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.35%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.29%

-18.77%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-33.67%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-3.53%

-5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-11.07%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.30%

+1.19%

Volatility

EDOG vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 4.39%, while Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDOGECOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.66%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

10.88%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

14.19%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

17.65%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.60%

20.13%

-2.53%

EDOG vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDOG vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than ECOW's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.60%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDOG
ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.88%4.50%6.55%6.53%5.07%4.11%2.60%4.93%5.37%2.89%2.97%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDOG and ECOW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECOW has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to EDOG (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 6.12% vs 4.71% for EDOG. On fees, EDOG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDOG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.60% for ECOW.

EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.70% for ECOW.

ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDOG and ECOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer