EDOG vs. ECOW
EDOG (ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EDOG tracks the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOG returned 6.40%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for ECOW. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EDOG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.
Performance
EDOG vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOG achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 12.88% return.
EDOG
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.44%
ECOW
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $573.24K | $693.96K | $1.37M | |
| $66.37K | $47.05K | $56.13K |
EDOG vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 5.43% | 22.59% | 1.70% | 11.58% | -10.50% | 11.71% | 7.99% | 3.14% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 12.88% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOG and ECOW is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EDOG and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDOG vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDOG
ECOW
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
EDOG
ECOW
Industrials
EDOG
ECOW
Healthcare
EDOG
ECOW
Consumer Defensive
EDOG
ECOW
Communication Services
EDOG
ECOW
Technology
EDOG
ECOW
Basic Materials
EDOG
ECOW
Consumer Cyclical
EDOG
ECOW
Utilities
EDOG
ECOW
Financial Services
EDOG
ECOW
-
Real Estate
EDOG
-
ECOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOG vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank
EDOG
ECOW
EDOG vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOG | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 3.50 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 9.20 | -5.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOG vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOG drawdown since its inception was -44.29%, which is greater than ECOW's maximum drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOG and ECOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOG | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -40.27% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -8.35% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -18.77% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | -33.30% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -3.72% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -10.93% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.17% | +1.74% |
Volatility
EDOG vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) is 3.19%, while Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that EDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOG | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.45% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 11.82% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 14.78% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 17.73% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 20.03% | -2.67% |
EDOG vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOG vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
EDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than ECOW's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.45% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDOG ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 4.88% | 4.50% | 6.55% | 6.53% | 5.07% | 4.11% | 2.60% | 4.93% | 5.37% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 4.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOG and ECOW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECOW has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to EDOG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOG dropped -44.29% vs ECOW's -40.27%.
On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 6.83% vs 6.40% for EDOG. On fees, EDOG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
EDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.45% for ECOW.
EDOG tracks S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EDOG and 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOG and ECOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer