EDOC vs. XYLD
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -12.35%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for XYLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
EDOC vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 6.88% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -7.84%
- 3Y*
- -7.38%
- 5Y*
- -12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 17.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
EDOC vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -2.48% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 6.88% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and XYLD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EDOC and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
XYLD
EDOC vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.56 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 3.24 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 16.88 | -17.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -33.46% | -32.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -5.29% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -15.53% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -18.66% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.90% | -0.22% | -57.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.33% | -3.69% | -39.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 1.01% | +15.30% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 2.10%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 2.10% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.10% | 5.91% | +11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.68% | 6.95% | +15.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 11.27% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.29% | 14.15% | +12.14% |
EDOC vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than XYLD's 10.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.30% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and XYLD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to XYLD (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 5-year performance, XYLD leads with 7.68% vs -12.35% for EDOC. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 7.68% return vs -12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.30%, compared with 0.25% for EDOC.
EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer