EDOC vs. URA
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.64%/yr vs 20.40%/yr for URA. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
EDOC vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.67% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 34.68%
- 5Y*
- 20.40%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
EDOC vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.67% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 31.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and URA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
URA
EDOC vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.13 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.87 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 1.87 | -2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -93.54% | +27.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -31.48% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -37.81% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -37.90% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.31% | -48.27% | -13.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -74.90% | +31.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 14.58% | +1.40% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 7.26%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 17.86% | -10.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 39.53% | -22.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 51.33% | -28.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 43.92% | -17.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 37.95% | -11.67% |
EDOC vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than URA's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.57% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and URA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.86%) compared to EDOC (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs URA's -93.54%.
On 5-year performance, URA leads with 20.40% vs -14.64% for EDOC. On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EDOC has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 20.40% return vs -14.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.37% for EDOC.
EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while URA is Uranium. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.69% for URA.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer