EDOC vs. PPH
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and PPH (VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while PPH tracks the MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -12.95%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for PPH. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PPH.
Performance
EDOC vs. PPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than PPH's 6.76% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
PPH
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 31.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K | |
| $27.28M | $26.89M | $27.29M |
EDOC vs. PPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -5.19% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 6.76% | 22.00% | 8.05% | 6.95% | 2.64% | 17.79% | 4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and PPH is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. PPH — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
PPH
EDOC vs. PPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.92 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 7.38 | -7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. PPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than PPH's maximum drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and PPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -51.45% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -10.76% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -18.06% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -20.26% | -38.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -4.35% | -54.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -17.22% | -26.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | 4.25% | +12.65% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. PPH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH) at 5.91%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | PPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 5.91% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 13.58% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 17.90% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 15.44% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 17.07% | +9.20% |
EDOC vs. PPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PPH's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. PPH - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than PPH's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPH VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.92% | 2.43% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and PPH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to PPH (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs PPH's -51.45%.
On 5-year performance, PPH leads with 9.77% vs -12.95% for EDOC. On fees, PPH is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, PPH has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PPH has performed better with a 9.77% return vs -12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPH is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
PPH has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.26% for EDOC.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while PPH tracks MVIS US Listed Pharmaceutical 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.36% for PPH.
PPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and PPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer