EDOC vs. GERM
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while GERM tracks the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EDOC returned -16.13% vs 0.00% for GERM. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
EDOC vs. GERM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDOC vs. GERM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | 5.70% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. GERM — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
GERM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDOC vs. GERM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. GERM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than GERM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and GERM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | 0.00% | -65.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | 0.00% | -30.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.31% | 0.00% | -61.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | 0.00% | -43.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 0.00% | +15.98% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. GERM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) at 0.00%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GERM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | GERM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 0.00% | +7.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 0.00% | +16.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 0.00% | +22.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 0.00% | +26.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 0.00% | +26.28% |
EDOC vs. GERM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EDOC and GERM have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
EDOC vs. GERM - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs GERM's 0.00%.
On 1-year performance, GERM leads with 0.00% vs -16.13% for EDOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GERM has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -16.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOC and GERM have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and GERM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer