EDOC vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

EDOC vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDOC

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: -10.37%
• 6M: -12.67%
• 1Y: -16.13%
• 3Y*: -8.12%
• 5Y*: -14.64%
• 10Y*: —

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOC vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	-0.46%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

EDOC vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC

EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 4
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CNCR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDOC	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	—	—

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOC	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	0.00%	-65.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.31%	0.00%	-61.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.20%	0.00%	-43.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDOC	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.43%	0.00%	+22.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.46%	0.00%	+26.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.28%	0.00%	+26.28%

EDOC vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDOC vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	0.37%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EDOC or CNCR?

On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOC or CNCR?

EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOC or CNCR?

EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between EDOC and CNCR?

EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.79% for CNCR.