EDOC vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.16%/yr vs 3.08%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -12.84% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 10.63% return.

EDOC

• 1D: 3.24%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: -12.84%
• 6M: -18.63%
• 1Y: -19.59%
• 3Y*: -9.61%
• 5Y*: -14.16%
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	-12.84%	-0.62%	-2.87%	-12.61%	-29.99%	-14.21%	23.87%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	10.63%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	29.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC and BOTZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.69

The correlation between EDOC and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EDOC vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC

EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 3
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDOC	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	1.19	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	1.82	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.21	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	1.48	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	5.08	-6.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOC and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDOC	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	1.19	-2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.54	0.12	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	0.44	-0.82

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOC	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-55.54%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	-19.34%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.78%	-29.02%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.36%	-55.54%	-4.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.37%	-3.72%	-58.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.04%	-18.32%	-24.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.21%	5.63%	+9.58%

Volatility

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 6.11%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDOC	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	7.76%	-1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.03%	18.41%	-2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.13%	23.97%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.41%	26.72%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.21%	25.72%	+0.49%

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EDOC and BOTZ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

EDOC vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	0.38%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDOC and BOTZ in my portfolio?

EDOC and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDOC or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to EDOC (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, EDOC or BOTZ?

On 5-year performance, BOTZ leads with 3.08% vs -14.16% for EDOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, EDOC has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDOC or BOTZ?

Over the 5-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 3.08% return vs -14.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOC or BOTZ?

EDOC and BOTZ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOC or BOTZ?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.38% for EDOC.

What is the main difference between EDOC and BOTZ?

EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.