EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE
EDMJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDMJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMJ.DE returned 9.20%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDMJ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDMJ.DE achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.
EDMJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 31.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.26% | 12.89% | 10.91% | 15.92% | -13.20% | 9.60% | 5.87% | 12.14% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMJ.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between EDMJ.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDMJ.DE
IS3N.DE
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMJ.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 4.42 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 16.00 | -6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMJ.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.69 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMJ.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMJ.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -35.06% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -10.52% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -19.17% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.81% | -22.01% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -2.49% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -9.30% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.91% | +0.24% |
Volatility
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) is 3.60%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that EDMJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMJ.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 7.16% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.69% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 17.32% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.19% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.04% | -0.52% |
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDMJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMJ.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMJ.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDMJ.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
EDMJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. EDMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EDMJ.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDMJ.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer