PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis (JSRI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDMJ.DE achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than JSRI.DE's 7.00% return.


EDMJ.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.26%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.64%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

JSRI.DE

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.00%
6M
6.81%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDMJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.26%12.89%10.91%15.92%-13.20%9.60%5.87%12.14%
JSRI.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis
7.00%3.81%1.12%10.63%-16.21%6.00%9.71%15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.94

The correlation between EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDMJ.DE
EDMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JSRI.DE
JSRI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JSRI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSRI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSRI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JSRI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSRI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis (JSRI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDMJ.DEJSRI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.12

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.98

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

2.86

+6.97

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the JSRI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDMJ.DEJSRI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.59

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.15

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.24

+0.29

Drawdowns

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, which is greater than JSRI.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDMJ.DEJSRI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.95%

-26.30%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-10.41%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-16.33%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-22.37%

+2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-2.61%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-9.43%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.59%

-0.44%

Volatility

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis (JSRI.DE) at 3.40%. This indicates that EDMJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSRI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDMJ.DEJSRI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.40%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

13.83%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

17.46%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

15.85%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

16.77%

+0.75%

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDMJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JSRI.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDMJ.DE vs. JSRI.DE - Dividend Comparison

EDMJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JSRI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EDMJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JSRI.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Dis
2.44%1.91%1.85%4.41%2.87%1.71%2.06%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JSRI.DE.

EDMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while JSRI.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EDMJ.DE and 0.25% for JSRI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDMJ.DE and JSRI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer