PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM6.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDM6.DE achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return.


EDM6.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.00%
6M
6.60%
YTD
10.24%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*

XB4A.DE

1D
-1.41%
1M
-2.86%
6M
19.27%
YTD
22.80%
1Y
45.21%
3Y*
30.57%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDM6.DE
iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc
10.24%17.51%8.25%15.75%-12.33%25.41%-1.45%9.98%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.80%51.29%11.01%14.27%-16.45%42.39%-10.86%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.74

The correlation between EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDM6.DE
EDM6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EDM6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XB4A.DE
XB4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM6.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDM6.DEXB4A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

4.13

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.31

13.97

-6.67

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDM6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDM6.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDM6.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-53.54%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-10.88%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-16.26%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-32.50%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-3.43%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-9.88%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.23%

-0.51%

Volatility

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF EUR Acc (EDM6.DE) is 2.99%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that EDM6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDM6.DEXB4A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

4.97%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

14.95%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

17.66%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

19.15%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

20.15%

-3.64%

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDM6.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDM6.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDM6.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDM6.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDM6.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

EDM6.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Enhanced Focus, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EDM6.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDM6.DE and XB4A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer