PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. SKOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. SKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than SKOR's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has outperformed SKOR with an annualized return of 9.49%, while SKOR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
0.70%
1M
0.84%
YTD
7.76%
6M
9.12%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
9.49%

SKOR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.54%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. SKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
7.76%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
0.54%7.99%4.42%7.64%-9.88%-1.40%8.84%10.69%-1.25%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and SKOR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.12

Over the past year, EDIV and SKOR have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. SKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SKOR
SKOR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. SKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIVSKORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.38

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

8.31

-4.30

EDIV vs. SKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SKOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and SKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. SKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than SKOR's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and SKOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVSKORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-15.98%

-37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-2.09%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-3.11%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-15.13%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-15.98%

-24.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-0.57%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-2.65%

-16.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

0.60%

+2.83%

Volatility

EDIV vs. SKOR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) at 0.94%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVSKORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

0.94%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

2.04%

+8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

2.71%

+9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

4.43%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

4.90%

+12.59%

EDIV vs. SKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SKOR's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. SKOR - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than SKOR's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.45%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
SKOR
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund
4.66%4.70%4.90%3.90%2.57%2.55%3.38%3.53%2.85%2.46%2.74%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and SKOR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to SKOR (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs SKOR's -15.98%.

On 10-year performance, EDIV leads with 9.49% vs 2.88% for SKOR. On fees, SKOR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, SKOR has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SKOR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

SKOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.45% for EDIV.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SKOR is Corporate Bonds. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while SKOR tracks NorthernTrustUS Corporate Bond Quality Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.22% for SKOR.

SKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and SKOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer