PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 8.98%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.58% annualized return.


EDIV

1D
-0.17%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
4.31%
6M
6.35%
1Y
11.64%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
8.98%

ILCV

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.03%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.96%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.31%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.35%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and ILCV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2011

0.61

The correlation between EDIV and ILCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EDIV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EDIV
ILCV

Financial Services

29.7%
16.5%

Communication Services

13.8%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

12.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
9.5%

Industrials

9.7%
8.8%

Technology

8.4%
23.8%

Real Estate

5.1%
2.0%

Energy

3.2%
6.0%

Utilities

2.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.4%

Healthcare

1.3%
11.5%

Financial Services

EDIV
29.7%
ILCV
16.5%

Communication Services

EDIV
13.8%
ILCV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

EDIV
12.8%
ILCV
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EDIV
11.8%
ILCV
9.5%

Industrials

EDIV
9.7%
ILCV
8.8%

Technology

EDIV
8.4%
ILCV
23.8%

Real Estate

EDIV
5.1%
ILCV
2.0%

Energy

EDIV
3.2%
ILCV
6.0%

Utilities

EDIV
2.5%
ILCV
3.5%

Basic Materials

EDIV
1.7%
ILCV
2.4%

Healthcare

EDIV
1.3%
ILCV
11.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDIVILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

3.93

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

16.24

-12.80

EDIV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDIVILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.61

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.81

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.70

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.46

-0.30

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.36%

-58.63%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-6.55%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-14.95%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

-18.58%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-35.53%

-5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-1.33%

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-9.32%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

1.58%

+1.81%

Volatility

EDIV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.33%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

2.33%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

7.12%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

9.90%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

14.23%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

16.67%

+0.83%

EDIV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.59%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to ILCV (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.58% vs 8.98% for EDIV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.58% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.

EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer