EDIV vs. HGER
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDIV returned 18.11%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for HGER. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
EDIV vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 21.56% return.
EDIV
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 13.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
HGER
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- 21.56%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 31.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 7.76% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -20.65% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 21.56% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and HGER is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.26 |
The correlation between EDIV and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDIV vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
HGER
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EDIV
HGER
-
Communication Services
EDIV
HGER
-
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
HGER
-
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
HGER
-
Industrials
EDIV
HGER
-
Technology
EDIV
HGER
-
Real Estate
EDIV
HGER
-
Energy
EDIV
HGER
-
Utilities
EDIV
HGER
-
Basic Materials
EDIV
HGER
Healthcare
EDIV
HGER
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
HGER
EDIV vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDIV | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.26 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 11.51 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -23.31% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -9.86% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -9.86% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -9.86% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -7.65% | -11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.78% | +0.65% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 3.70%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 3.70% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 14.85% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 17.10% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 17.62% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 17.62% | -0.13% |
EDIV vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than HGER's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.45% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.83% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and HGER have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to HGER (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.07% vs 18.11% for EDIV. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 18.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 4.45% for EDIV.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HGER is Commodities. EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer