EDIV vs. ECOW
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EDIV tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index while ECOW tracks the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDIV returned 12.10%/yr vs 7.05%/yr for ECOW. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.
Performance
EDIV vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 12.74% return.
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
ECOW
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 30.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 9.97% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 2.75% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 12.74% | 32.50% | 3.17% | 15.79% | -19.28% | 7.47% | -2.51% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and ECOW is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EDIV and ECOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDIV vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
ECOW
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
ECOW
-
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
ECOW
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
ECOW
Technology
EDIV
ECOW
Industrials
EDIV
ECOW
Communication Services
EDIV
ECOW
Energy
EDIV
ECOW
Real Estate
EDIV
ECOW
-
Utilities
EDIV
ECOW
Basic Materials
EDIV
ECOW
Healthcare
EDIV
ECOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
ECOW
EDIV vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDIV | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.66 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 9.98 | -5.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than ECOW's maximum drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and ECOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -40.27% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -8.35% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -18.77% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -33.30% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -3.83% | +2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -10.98% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.06% | +0.48% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) have volatilities of 4.02% and 4.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.23% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 12.07% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 14.85% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 17.78% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 20.08% | -2.78% |
EDIV vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than ECOW's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.45% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.13% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and ECOW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECOW has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to EDIV (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs ECOW's -40.27%.
On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 12.10% vs 7.05% for ECOW. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.13% for EDIV.
EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.70% for ECOW.
ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and ECOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer