EDIV vs. CGDV
EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. EDIV is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDIV returned 16.98%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
EDIV vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 10.15% return.
EDIV
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.31% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -14.89% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV and CGDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EDIV and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EDIV vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDIV
CGDV
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
EDIV
CGDV
Communication Services
EDIV
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
EDIV
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
EDIV
CGDV
Industrials
EDIV
CGDV
Technology
EDIV
CGDV
Real Estate
EDIV
CGDV
Energy
EDIV
CGDV
Utilities
EDIV
CGDV
Basic Materials
EDIV
CGDV
Healthcare
EDIV
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDIV vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV
CGDV
EDIV vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.84 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 13.37 | -9.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.34 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 1.21 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
EDIV vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -21.82% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -9.75% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -14.28% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -2.22% | -3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -3.61% | -15.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 2.07% | +1.32% |
Volatility
EDIV vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.60%. This indicates that EDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.60% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 9.47% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 11.85% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 15.51% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 15.51% | +1.99% |
EDIV vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDIV vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDIV and CGDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 16.98% for EDIV. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 16.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
EDIV is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EDIV and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDIV and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer