EDIV vs. BCSVX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) are both funds - EDIV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index, while BCSVX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brown Capital Management. Over the past 10 years, EDIV returned 9.49%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for BCSVX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for BCSVX.

Performance

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EDIV has outperformed BCSVX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while BCSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.55% annualized return.

EDIV

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 9.12%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: 9.49%

BCSVX

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: -11.70%
• 6M: -11.62%
• 1Y: -22.10%
• 3Y*: -0.05%
• 5Y*: -3.94%
• 10Y*: 7.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	7.76%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	-9.95%	11.80%	-6.16%	28.20%
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	-11.70%	-2.30%	8.17%	20.04%	-31.56%	12.69%	44.75%	26.41%	-3.39%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV and BCSVX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.46

The correlation between EDIV and BCSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EDIV vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 33
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BCSVX

BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 0
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDIV	BCSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	-1.29	+2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	-1.79	+3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.80	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	-0.68	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	-1.27	+5.28

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the BCSVX Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV and BCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than BCSVX's maximum drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV and BCSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIV	BCSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.36%	-43.93%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.36%	-32.35%	+21.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.84%	-32.35%	+18.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.32%	-43.93%	+15.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.76%	-43.93%	+3.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-26.44%	+23.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.33%	-12.15%	-7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	17.30%	-13.87%

Volatility

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) is 4.64%, while Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that EDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIV	BCSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	4.90%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	14.03%	-3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	17.07%	-4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	18.70%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	17.14%	+0.35%

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDIV vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison

EDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than BCSVX's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.07%	0.74%	0.30%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.45%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDIV and BCSVX in my portfolio?

EDIV and BCSVX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDIV or BCSVX?

BCSVX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to EDIV (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIV dropped -53.36% vs BCSVX's -43.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.