BCSVX vs. ACINX
BCSVX (Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund) and ACINX (Columbia Acorn International Fund) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX returned 6.96%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for ACINX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSVX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ACINX.
Performance
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSVX achieves a -14.99% return, which is significantly lower than ACINX's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BCSVX has outperformed ACINX with an annualized return of 6.96%, while ACINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.
BCSVX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -14.99%
- 6M
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- -22.92%
- 3Y*
- -2.43%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
ACINX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund | -14.99% | -2.30% | 8.17% | 20.04% | -31.56% | 12.69% | 44.75% | 26.41% | -3.39% | 36.56% |
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | 7.56% | 12.52% | -6.57% | 19.57% | -33.64% | 12.92% | 15.15% | 29.84% | -18.35% | 31.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSVX and ACINX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between BCSVX and ACINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSVX vs. ACINX — Risk / Return Rank
BCSVX
ACINX
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) and Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCSVX | ACINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.08 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.50 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 1.58 | -2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSVX drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, smaller than the maximum ACINX drawdown of -60.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSVX and ACINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSVX | ACINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.93% | -60.92% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.35% | -14.23% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.35% | -22.22% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -46.12% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | -46.12% | +2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.18% | -13.77% | -15.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | -15.71% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.68% | 4.46% | +13.22% |
Volatility
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) is 5.09%, while Columbia Acorn International Fund (ACINX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that BCSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSVX | ACINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 5.43% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 15.05% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.99% | 17.87% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 19.21% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 18.37% | -1.24% |
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSVX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ACINX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSVX vs. ACINX - Dividend Comparison
BCSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than ACINX's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACINX Columbia Acorn International Fund | 4.74% | 5.92% | 10.97% | 0.00% | 3.12% | 16.16% | 12.94% | 11.09% | 29.07% | 6.17% | 1.33% | 5.34% |
BCSVX Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.07% | 0.74% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSVX and ACINX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACINX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to BCSVX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCSVX dropped -43.93% vs ACINX's -60.92%.
ACINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCSVX and ACINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer