EDGU vs. SCHK
EDGU (3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. EDGU is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past year, EDGU returned 23.76% vs 23.67% for SCHK. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EDGU charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
EDGU vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDGU achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 8.54% return.
EDGU
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 23.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
EDGU vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EDGU 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF | 10.33% | 14.79% | 0.34% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.54% | 17.23% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGU and SCHK is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EDGU and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EDGU vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EDGU
SCHK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EDGU
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
EDGU
SCHK
Communication Services
EDGU
SCHK
Financial Services
EDGU
SCHK
Industrials
EDGU
SCHK
Energy
EDGU
SCHK
Healthcare
EDGU
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
EDGU
SCHK
Basic Materials
EDGU
SCHK
Utilities
EDGU
SCHK
Real Estate
EDGU
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGU vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
EDGU
SCHK
EDGU vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.65 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 11.81 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGU vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGU drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGU and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -34.80% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -8.97% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -2.98% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -5.16% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.01% | -0.10% |
Volatility
EDGU vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 4.96%. This indicates that EDGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 4.96% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 10.10% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 12.84% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 17.34% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 19.12% | -3.70% |
EDGU vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGU has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGU vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
EDGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGU 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EDGU and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EDGU has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to SCHK (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGU dropped -17.58% vs SCHK's -34.80%.
On 1-year performance, EDGU leads with 23.76% vs 23.67% for SCHK. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EDGU has performed better with a 23.76% return vs 23.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for EDGU.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.66% for EDGU.
They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for EDGU and 0.03% for SCHK.
EDGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDGU and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer