EDGQ vs. URA
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. EDGQ is actively managed, while URA is passively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
EDGQ vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -28.95%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 25.57%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370.87K | $410.33K | $365.52K | |
| $122.45M | $118.35M | $170.14M |
EDGQ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 12.28% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | -23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and URA is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
EDGQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
URA
EDGQ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDGQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -93.54% | +83.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -55.66% | +49.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -74.75% | +72.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.11% | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 52.24% | -32.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 44.10% | -23.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 38.10% | -17.92% |
EDGQ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than URA's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 5.33% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and URA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 5.33% for URA.
EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while URA is Uranium. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer