PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGQ vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGQ vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EDGQ

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.69%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBP

1D
0.13%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.58%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and PBP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGQ

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGQ vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EDGQ vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGQPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.23

0.35

+4.88

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGQPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-43.43%

+35.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.04%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-6.69%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

Volatility

EDGQ vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGQPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

6.87%

+9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

11.86%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

13.66%

+2.31%

EDGQ vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGQ vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than PBP's 11.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDGQ
Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF
3.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.14%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDGQ and PBP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDGQ.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.14%, compared with 3.36% for EDGQ.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.29% for PBP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGQ and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer