EDGQ vs. PBP
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. EDGQ is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.
Performance
EDGQ vs. PBP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
EDGQ vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 19.41% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and PBP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank
EDGQ
PBP
EDGQ vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGQ | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.23 | 0.35 | +4.88 |
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and PBP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -43.43% | +35.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.04% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -6.69% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.98% | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 6.87% | +9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 11.86% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 13.66% | +2.31% |
EDGQ vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than PBP's 11.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.14% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and PBP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDGQ.
PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.14%, compared with 3.36% for EDGQ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.29% for PBP.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and PBP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer