EDGQ vs. IPDP
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $370.87K | $410.33K | $365.52K |
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 12.28% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | — | — |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | — | — |
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 5.71% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer