EDGQ vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. EDGQ is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDGQ

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 9.40%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.89%
• 1Y: 29.53%
• 3Y*: 12.97%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	20.02%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and BOTZ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGQ	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.51	0.44	+5.07

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGQ	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-55.54%	+47.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-3.27%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-18.32%	+17.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDGQ	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	23.98%	-7.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	26.73%	-10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	25.73%	-9.71%

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGQ vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.59%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGQ and BOTZ in my portfolio?

EDGQ and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDGQ or BOTZ?

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGQ or BOTZ?

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGQ or BOTZ?

EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between EDGQ and BOTZ?

EDGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while BOTZ is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.68% for BOTZ.