PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDGQ vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDGQ vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EDGQ

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.69%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
0.47%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGQ vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EDGQ and ACII is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDGQ vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EDGQ vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDGQACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.23

-3.57

+8.80

Drawdowns

EDGQ vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDGQACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-1.27%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.80%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-0.50%

-0.78%

Volatility

EDGQ vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDGQACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

8.49%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

8.49%

+7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

8.49%

+7.48%

EDGQ vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDGQ vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than ACII's 0.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EDGQ and ACII have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACII.

EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.73% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDGQ and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer