EDGQ vs. ACII
EDGQ (Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. EDGQ charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.
Performance
EDGQ vs. ACII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EDGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDGQ vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 0.78% |
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDGQ and ACII is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDGQ vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF (EDGQ) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDGQ | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.23 | -3.57 | +8.80 |
Drawdowns
EDGQ vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDGQ drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGQ and ACII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDGQ | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -1.27% | -6.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.80% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.28% | -0.50% | -0.78% |
Volatility
EDGQ vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDGQ | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 8.49% | +7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 8.49% | +7.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 8.49% | +7.48% |
EDGQ vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDGQ has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDGQ vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison
EDGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than ACII's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.73% |
EDGQ Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDGQ and ACII have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGQ is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGQ is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ACII.
EDGQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.73% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDGQ and 0.79% for ACII.
Find the right allocation for EDGQ and ACII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer