EDGI vs. RODM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EDGI (3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EDGI is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Over the past year, EDGI returned 22.76% vs 26.65% for RODM. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EDGI charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

EDGI vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGI achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 14.35% return.

EDGI

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 4.01%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 1Y: 22.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.84%

RODM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.46%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 1Y: 26.65%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 9.11%
• ALL TIME*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	$817.52K	$2.19M	$1.06M
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	$2.55M	$3.01M	$3.76M

EDGI vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	9.43%	26.77%	-7.13%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	14.35%	34.42%	-4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGI and RODM is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.82

The correlation between EDGI and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

EDGI vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EDGI	RODM
Technology	20.4%	6.9%
Industrials	19.9%	17.0%
Financial Services	19.4%	27.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	6.8%
Healthcare	6.2%	9.7%
Basic Materials	6.1%	4.8%
Communication Services	5.5%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	8.1%
Energy	2.8%	5.4%
Real Estate	2.5%	3.5%
Utilities	1.9%	5.2%

Return for Risk

EDGI vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDGI

EDGI Risk / Return Rank: 49
EDGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EDGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EDGI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
EDGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EDGI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 91
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDGI vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDGI	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.47	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	3.50	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.45	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	3.77	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	15.17	-9.07

EDGI vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGI and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDGI vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGI drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGI and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGI	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.52%	-35.98%	+21.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-7.10%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-0.57%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-6.30%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	1.76%	+1.98%

Volatility

EDGI vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF (EDGI) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.07%. This indicates that EDGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGI	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	3.07%	+2.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	8.91%	+5.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	10.86%	+5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	13.46%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	14.96%	+1.63%

EDGI vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGI vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

EDGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than RODM's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDGI 3EDGE Dynamic International Equity ETF	1.38%	1.97%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.79%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGI and RODM in my portfolio?

EDGI and RODM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGI or RODM?

EDGI has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to RODM (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGI dropped -14.52% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, EDGI or RODM?

On 1-year performance, RODM leads with 26.65% vs 22.76% for EDGI. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGI or RODM?

Over the 1-year period, RODM has performed better with a 26.65% return vs 22.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGI or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for EDGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGI or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.38% for EDGI.

What is the main difference between EDGI and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for EDGI and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.