EDGH vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDGH (3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGH is a Commodities fund actively managed by 3EDGE Asset Management, while ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EDGH charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

EDGH vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EDGH

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 6M: 14.30%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGH vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	-0.39%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGH and ARMH is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

EDGH vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGH

EDGH Risk / Return Rank: 54
EDGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EDGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EDGH Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EDGH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGH vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF (EDGH) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDGH	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGH	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	471,500.14	-471,498.62

Drawdowns

EDGH vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGH drawdown since its inception was -10.60%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGH and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGH	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-1.61%	-8.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	0.00%	-4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-0.40%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EDGH	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.72%	113.00%	-95.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	113.00%	-97.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.60%	113.00%	-97.40%

EDGH vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGH has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGH vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

EDGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDGH 3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF	1.05%	1.18%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGH and ARMH in my portfolio?

EDGH and ARMH have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDGH or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGH or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for EDGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGH or ARMH?

EDGH has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between EDGH and ARMH?

EDGH is categorized as Commodities, while ARMH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: 3EDGE Asset Management and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for EDGH and 0.19% for ARMH.