EDGE vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDGE (MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDGE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by MRBL, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. EDGE is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, EDGE returned 28.99% vs 23.93% for QYLD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDGE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

EDGE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDGE achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

EDGE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDGE vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EDGE MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF	9.19%	13.16%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EDGE and QYLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.86

The correlation between EDGE and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EDGE vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDGE

EDGE Risk / Return Rank: 80
EDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDGE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDGE	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.80	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.92	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.63	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	4.84	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.20	28.36	-11.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDGE vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDGE and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDGE	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.80	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.59	+0.47

Drawdowns

EDGE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDGE drawdown since its inception was -20.66%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDGE and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDGE	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.66%	-24.75%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-4.97%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.06%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-3.84%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	0.85%	+0.84%

Volatility

EDGE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF (EDGE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) have volatilities of 1.80% and 1.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDGE	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	1.85%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	7.12%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.28%	8.58%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.95%	14.70%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.95%	15.49%	+0.46%

EDGE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDGE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDGE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

EDGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDGE MRBL Enhanced Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDGE and QYLD in my portfolio?

EDGE and QYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDGE or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to EDGE (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDGE dropped -20.66% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, EDGE or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, EDGE leads with 28.99% vs 23.93% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDGE or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, EDGE has performed better with a 28.99% return vs 23.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDGE or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDGE or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.00% for EDGE.

What is the main difference between EDGE and QYLD?

EDGE is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: MRBL and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EDGE and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.