EDEN vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EDEN returned 8.15%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for BNO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDEN charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

EDEN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 8.15%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.

EDEN

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: 0.51%
• 1Y: -2.97%
• 3Y*: 2.98%
• 5Y*: 2.24%
• 10Y*: 8.15%

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDEN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	-3.95%	10.58%	-3.94%	17.99%	-11.47%	14.81%	42.56%	24.37%	-14.43%	35.39%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	86.76%	-5.44%	9.67%	-3.43%	35.25%	62.34%	-38.23%	36.01%	-15.30%	15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EDEN and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012	0.13

The correlation between EDEN and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EDEN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDEN

EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 7
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDEN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDEN	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	2.17	-2.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	2.68	-2.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.37	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	5.39	-5.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.21	10.23	-10.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDEN vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDEN and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDEN	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	2.17	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.68	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.37	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.14	+0.50

Drawdowns

EDEN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDEN	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.61%	-87.06%	+50.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.17%	-17.87%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.31%	-23.75%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.61%	-33.70%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.61%	-75.18%	+38.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.36%	-12.04%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-40.18%	+32.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.00%	9.43%	+0.57%

Volatility

EDEN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 5.09%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDEN	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	15.03%	-9.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.59%	36.08%	-20.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.92%	41.56%	-20.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.21%	35.37%	-15.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	36.68%	-17.25%

EDEN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDEN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	2.90%	2.79%	1.50%	1.92%	1.47%	0.74%	0.42%	2.36%	2.01%	2.03%	1.28%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDEN and BNO in my portfolio?

EDEN and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDEN or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to EDEN (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDEN dropped -36.61% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, EDEN or BNO?

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.38% vs 8.15% for EDEN. On fees, EDEN is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDEN or BNO?

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDEN or BNO?

EDEN is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDEN or BNO?

EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between EDEN and BNO?

EDEN is categorized as Europe Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for EDEN and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.