PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^FCHI vs. ^AEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CAC 40 (^FCHI) and AEX Index (^AEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^FCHI
CAC 40
-2.06%10.42%-2.15%16.52%-9.50%28.85%-7.14%26.37%-10.95%9.26%
^AEX
AEX Index
2.67%8.27%11.67%14.20%-13.65%27.75%3.31%23.92%-10.41%12.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^FCHI achieves a -2.06% return, which is significantly lower than ^AEX's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ^FCHI has underperformed ^AEX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while ^AEX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.


^FCHI

1D
2.10%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-2.06%
6M
0.18%
1Y
1.33%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
6.33%

^AEX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.01%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^FCHI vs. ^AEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^FCHI
^FCHI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
^FCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^FCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
^FCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
^FCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
^FCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

^AEX
^AEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
^AEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^AEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
^AEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
^AEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
^AEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAC 40 (^FCHI) and AEX Index (^AEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^FCHI^AEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.50

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.21

0.76

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.11

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.36

-1.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.04

5.66

-2.62

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^FCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the ^AEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^FCHI and ^AEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^FCHI^AEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.50

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.42

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.51

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.36

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between ^FCHI and ^AEX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^FCHI drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum ^AEX drawdown of -71.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^FCHI and ^AEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^FCHI^AEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-71.60%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-11.65%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.04%

-23.80%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.56%

-35.78%

-2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.42%

-5.18%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-22.69%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.84%

+0.35%

Volatility

^FCHI vs. ^AEX - Volatility Comparison

CAC 40 (^FCHI) and AEX Index (^AEX) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^FCHI^AEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.17%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.00%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

15.47%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

15.39%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.22%

+1.45%