PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CAC 40 (^FCHI) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^FCHI
CAC 40
-2.30%10.42%-2.15%16.52%-9.50%28.85%-7.14%26.37%-10.95%9.26%
^GDAXI
DAX Performance Index
-5.40%23.01%18.85%20.31%-12.35%15.79%3.55%25.48%-18.26%12.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^FCHI achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly higher than ^GDAXI's -5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ^FCHI has underperformed ^GDAXI with an annualized return of 6.24%, while ^GDAXI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


^FCHI

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
6.24%

^GDAXI

1D
-0.56%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-5.14%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^FCHI
^FCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
^FCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^FCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
^FCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
^FCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
^FCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

^GDAXI
^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAC 40 (^FCHI) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^FCHI^GDAXIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

0.20

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.21

0.38

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.05

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.54

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.63

1.91

+2.72

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^FCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^FCHI and ^GDAXI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^FCHI^GDAXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.20

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.53

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.49

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.41

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between ^FCHI and ^GDAXI is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^FCHI drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, smaller than the maximum ^GDAXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^FCHI and ^GDAXI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^FCHI^GDAXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-72.68%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-12.27%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.04%

-26.40%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.56%

-38.78%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-8.86%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-14.75%

-8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.50%

-0.27%

Volatility

^FCHI vs. ^GDAXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CAC 40 (^FCHI) is 5.18%, while DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that ^FCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GDAXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^FCHI^GDAXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

6.64%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

11.28%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

17.64%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.80%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

18.30%

-0.64%