EDD vs. PYELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX).
EDD is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 24, 2007. PYELX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011.
Performance
EDD vs. PYELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDD vs. PYELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | -2.66% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | -3.00% | 19.79% | -3.48% | 13.16% | -11.28% | -7.83% | 1.79% | 13.92% | -8.16% | 15.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a -2.66% return, which is significantly higher than PYELX's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has outperformed PYELX with an annualized return of 4.57%, while PYELX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.
EDD
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -12.63%
- YTD
- -2.66%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
PYELX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDD vs. PYELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PYELX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDD vs. PYELX — Risk / Return Rank
EDD
PYELX
EDD vs. PYELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDD | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.11 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.22 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.77 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.24 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 3.45 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDD | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.11 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.04 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.07 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.03 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDD and PYELX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EDD vs. PYELX - Dividend Comparison
EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than PYELX's 7.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 9.92% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund | 7.49% | 7.32% | 7.08% | 5.38% | 5.93% | 5.36% | 4.69% | 5.46% | 6.67% | 6.15% | 5.44% | 5.26% |
Drawdowns
EDD vs. PYELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, roughly equal to the maximum PYELX drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and PYELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDD | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -56.98% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -50.21% | +32.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.04% | -51.98% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.70% | -52.62% | +9.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -6.64% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.38% | -16.96% | -7.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 3.54% | +0.61% |
Volatility
EDD vs. PYELX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) at 3.36%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDD | PYELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 3.36% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.64% | 4.66% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 111.80% | -94.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 50.59% | -35.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 36.37% | -18.72% |