EDD vs. MSEGX
EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) and MSEGX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - EDD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while MSEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Morgan Stanley. Over the past 10 years, EDD returned 5.44%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for MSEGX. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDD charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for MSEGX.
Performance
EDD vs. MSEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSEGX's -10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has underperformed MSEGX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while MSEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.
EDD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.98%
MSEGX
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 1Y
- -4.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- -3.00%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.90M | $2.96M | $2.41M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EDD vs. MSEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 15.39% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | -10.37% | 24.43% | 46.29% | 49.87% | -60.27% | -0.31% | 115.11% | 38.93% | 5.01% | 43.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDD and MSEGX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDD vs. MSEGX — Risk / Return Rank
EDD
MSEGX
EDD vs. MSEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDD | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | -0.29 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | -0.56 | +5.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDD vs. MSEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum MSEGX drawdown of -69.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and MSEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDD | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -69.57% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -27.83% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.67% | -32.54% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.04% | -69.57% | +37.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.70% | -69.57% | +26.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -22.53% | +20.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.05% | -19.50% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 14.53% | -9.03% |
Volatility
EDD vs. MSEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) is 4.59%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that EDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDD | MSEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 7.39% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 22.95% | -9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 29.73% | -12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 39.92% | -24.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 33.96% | -16.29% |
EDD vs. MSEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEGX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDD vs. MSEGX - Dividend Comparison
EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%, while MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 10.77% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 18.70% | 26.52% | 10.03% | 22.75% | 5.67% | 22.18% | 13.17% | 7.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDD and MSEGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSEGX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to EDD (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs MSEGX's -69.57%.
EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDD and MSEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer