EDD vs. MSEGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) and MSEGX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - EDD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley, while MSEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Morgan Stanley. Over the past 10 years, EDD returned 5.09%/yr vs 17.13%/yr for MSEGX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDD charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for MSEGX.

Performance

EDD vs. MSEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than MSEGX's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has underperformed MSEGX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while MSEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.13% annualized return.

EDD

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 5.85%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

MSEGX

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 8.80%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: 1.56%
• 10Y*: 17.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. MSEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	3.21%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-14.09%	16.34%
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio	-1.30%	24.43%	46.29%	49.87%	-60.27%	-0.31%	115.11%	38.93%	5.01%	43.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and MSEGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2007	0.36

The correlation between EDD and MSEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EDD vs. MSEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 15
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

MSEGX

MSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. MSEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDD	MSEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	0.34	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	0.66	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.08	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	0.34	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	0.73	+2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDD vs. MSEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the MSEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and MSEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDD	MSEGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	0.34	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.04	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.51	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.42	-0.31

Drawdowns

EDD vs. MSEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum MSEGX drawdown of -69.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and MSEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDD	MSEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.38%	-69.57%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-27.83%	+10.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.67%	-32.54%	+14.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.04%	-69.57%	+37.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.70%	-69.57%	+26.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	-14.69%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.23%	-19.50%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	12.89%	-7.63%

Volatility

EDD vs. MSEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) is 4.70%, while Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that EDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDD	MSEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	8.13%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	21.31%	-8.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	27.99%	-11.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	39.72%	-24.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	33.79%	-16.07%

EDD vs. MSEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEGX's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDD vs. MSEGX - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, while MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	9.36%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%
MSEGX Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	18.70%	26.52%	10.03%	22.75%	5.67%	22.18%	13.17%	7.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDD and MSEGX in my portfolio?

EDD and MSEGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDD or MSEGX?

MSEGX has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to EDD (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs MSEGX's -69.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.