PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSEGX vs. WSTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSEGX achieves a -8.43% return, which is significantly lower than WSTAX's 31.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MSEGX has underperformed WSTAX with an annualized return of 15.55%, while WSTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.25% annualized return.


MSEGX

1D
2.07%
1M
-6.01%
6M
-0.09%
YTD
-8.43%
1Y
-2.72%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
-2.58%
10Y*
15.55%
ALL TIME*
10.90%

WSTAX

1D
5.34%
1M
-3.36%
6M
22.27%
YTD
31.65%
1Y
49.56%
3Y*
44.90%
5Y*
21.87%
10Y*
23.25%
ALL TIME*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSEGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio
-8.43%24.43%46.29%49.87%-60.27%-0.31%115.11%38.93%5.01%43.53%
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
31.65%33.91%59.64%40.44%-32.50%14.19%36.12%50.35%-5.23%32.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MSEGX and WSTAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.82

The correlation between MSEGX and WSTAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSEGX vs. WSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSEGX
MSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

WSTAX
WSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) and Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSEGXWSTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.28

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

2.77

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

8.73

-9.07

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the WSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSEGX and WSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSEGX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than WSTAX's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSEGX and WSTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSEGXWSTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-55.39%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.83%

-16.73%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.54%

-27.35%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.57%

-55.39%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.57%

-55.39%

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.86%

-9.75%

-11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-14.89%

-4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.47%

5.30%

+9.17%

Volatility

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio (MSEGX) is 7.40%, while Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A (WSTAX) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that MSEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSEGXWSTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

10.23%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.91%

23.94%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.66%

28.62%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.92%

37.65%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.95%

31.01%

+2.94%

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSEGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than WSTAX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSEGX vs. WSTAX - Dividend Comparison

MSEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSEGX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.42%0.00%18.70%26.52%10.03%22.75%5.67%22.18%13.17%7.76%
WSTAX
Nomura Science and Technology Fund Class A
13.91%18.32%36.08%11.62%33.72%42.99%8.89%11.48%13.99%6.95%0.00%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSEGX and WSTAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSTAX has higher volatility (10.23%) compared to MSEGX (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSEGX dropped -69.57% vs WSTAX's -55.39%.

WSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSEGX and WSTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer