PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSD vs. TMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSD vs. TMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSD achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than TMO's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MSD has underperformed TMO with an annualized return of 4.84%, while TMO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.21% annualized return.


MSD

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.55%
6M
-1.72%
YTD
2.01%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
4.84%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

TMO

1D
-0.43%
1M
9.72%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.69%
1Y
24.48%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
14.21%
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$462.06K$515.29K$664.52K
$1.57B$1.22B$1.19B

MSD vs. TMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
2.01%5.58%24.92%19.14%-22.10%2.20%0.73%24.38%-12.31%16.33%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
-0.69%11.78%-1.72%-3.36%-17.29%43.54%43.72%45.55%18.21%35.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MSD and TMO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSD:

$146.47M

TMO:

$213.42B

EPS

MSD:

$1.85

TMO:

$18.62

PE Ratio

MSD:

3.91

TMO:

30.84

PS Ratio

MSD:

3.80

TMO:

4.64

PB Ratio

MSD:

0.92

TMO:

4.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSD:

$38.58M

TMO:

$46.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSD:

$35.05M

TMO:

$18.71B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSD:

$30.02M

TMO:

$10.94B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSD vs. TMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSD
MSD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TMO
TMO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSD vs. TMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSDTMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.16

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

0.74

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

1.46

+0.02

MSD vs. TMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSD Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the TMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSD and TMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSD vs. TMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSD drawdown since its inception was -58.51%, smaller than the maximum TMO drawdown of -71.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSD and TMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDTMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.51%

-71.16%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-31.38%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-37.28%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-40.95%

+7.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.50%

-40.95%

+3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-12.79%

+7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-18.12%

+6.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

15.94%

-12.10%

Volatility

MSD vs. TMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) is 2.45%, while Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that MSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDTMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

10.24%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

24.17%

-15.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

30.65%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

27.64%

-13.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

26.57%

-11.85%

Dividends

MSD vs. TMO - Dividend Comparison

MSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than TMO's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
8.43%9.88%11.88%10.90%7.34%4.99%4.67%5.37%6.56%5.81%6.87%7.03%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
0.31%0.30%0.30%0.26%0.22%0.16%0.19%0.23%0.30%0.32%0.43%0.42%

Financials

MSD vs. TMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSD and TMO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMO has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to MSD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSD dropped -58.51% vs TMO's -71.16%.

TMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSD and TMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer