PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSD vs. LQDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSD and LQDW is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MSD vs. LQDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
12.84%
-0.03%
MSD
LQDW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSD:

2.53

LQDW:

1.10

Sortino Ratio

MSD:

3.73

LQDW:

1.51

Omega Ratio

MSD:

1.48

LQDW:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

MSD:

3.08

LQDW:

0.94

Martin Ratio

MSD:

13.98

LQDW:

3.05

Ulcer Index

MSD:

2.07%

LQDW:

1.60%

Daily Std Dev

MSD:

11.48%

LQDW:

4.42%

Max Drawdown

MSD:

-52.67%

LQDW:

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

MSD:

-0.25%

LQDW:

-1.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSD achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly higher than LQDW's 1.69% return.


MSD

YTD

5.45%

1M

2.53%

6M

12.84%

1Y

29.32%

5Y*

4.05%

10Y*

6.07%

LQDW

YTD

1.69%

1M

0.93%

6M

-0.03%

1Y

4.61%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSD vs. LQDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSD is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSD is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSD is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSD is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSD is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSD is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDW is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDW is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDW is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDW is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSD vs. LQDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) and iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSD, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.531.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSD, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.731.51
The chart of Omega ratio for MSD, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.481.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSD, currently valued at 4.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.770.94
The chart of Martin ratio for MSD, currently valued at 13.98, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0013.983.05
MSD
LQDW

The current MSD Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the LQDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSD and LQDW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.53
1.10
MSD
LQDW

Dividends

MSD vs. LQDW - Dividend Comparison

MSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.27%, less than LQDW's 15.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
11.27%11.88%10.92%7.34%4.99%4.68%5.37%6.56%5.81%6.87%7.04%6.27%
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF
15.82%15.74%19.28%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MSD vs. LQDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSD drawdown since its inception was -52.67%, which is greater than LQDW's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSD and LQDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.25%
-1.17%
MSD
LQDW

Volatility

MSD vs. LQDW - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) at 0.48%. This indicates that MSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.04%
0.48%
MSD
LQDW
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab