EDD vs. FEMDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) and FEMDX (Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EDD returned 5.09%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for FEMDX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDD charges 2.20%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FEMDX.

Performance

EDD vs. FEMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than FEMDX's 7.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EDD has underperformed FEMDX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while FEMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.15% annualized return.

EDD

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 5.85%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

FEMDX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 8.95%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: 16.62%
• 5Y*: 7.89%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDD vs. FEMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	3.21%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-14.09%	16.34%
FEMDX Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund	7.92%	15.69%	11.83%	15.47%	-8.87%	1.58%	3.93%	9.92%	-1.19%	11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and FEMDX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2007	0.44

Return for Risk

EDD vs. FEMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 15
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FEMDX

FEMDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FEMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FEMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FEMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FEMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FEMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDD vs. FEMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDD	FEMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	4.92	-3.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	8.35	-6.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.24	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	5.98	-4.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	28.54	-24.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EDD vs. FEMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FEMDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and FEMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDD	FEMDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	4.92	-3.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	1.22	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	1.21	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	1.02	-0.90

Drawdowns

EDD vs. FEMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than FEMDX's maximum drawdown of -36.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and FEMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDD	FEMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.38%	-36.14%	-23.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.67%	-3.54%	-14.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.67%	-6.17%	-11.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.04%	-19.93%	-12.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.70%	-19.93%	-22.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	0.00%	-9.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.23%	-4.75%	-19.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	0.74%	+4.52%

Volatility

EDD vs. FEMDX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) at 1.21%. This indicates that EDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDD	FEMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	1.21%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	3.74%	+9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	4.30%	+11.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	6.48%	+8.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	5.91%	+11.81%

EDD vs. FEMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDD has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMDX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDD vs. FEMDX - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than FEMDX's 6.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	9.36%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%
FEMDX Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund	6.01%	6.49%	4.65%	3.12%	9.31%	0.00%	0.00%	7.29%	8.06%	4.29%	0.69%	6.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDD and FEMDX in my portfolio?

EDD and FEMDX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDD or FEMDX?

EDD has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FEMDX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs FEMDX's -36.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.