PortfoliosLab logo
FEMDX vs. EELDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FEMDX and EELDX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FEMDX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FEMDX:

1.95

EELDX:

3.39

Sortino Ratio

FEMDX:

2.45

EELDX:

4.82

Omega Ratio

FEMDX:

1.40

EELDX:

1.76

Calmar Ratio

FEMDX:

1.48

EELDX:

3.37

Martin Ratio

FEMDX:

6.60

EELDX:

16.40

Ulcer Index

FEMDX:

1.26%

EELDX:

0.68%

Daily Std Dev

FEMDX:

4.59%

EELDX:

3.40%

Max Drawdown

FEMDX:

-31.81%

EELDX:

-19.12%

Current Drawdown

FEMDX:

-0.67%

EELDX:

-0.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMDX achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMDX has underperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 5.35%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.25% annualized return.


FEMDX

YTD

2.87%

1M

1.63%

6M

1.97%

1Y

8.87%

3Y*

10.37%

5Y*

8.10%

10Y*

5.35%

EELDX

YTD

5.20%

1M

2.24%

6M

6.31%

1Y

11.55%

3Y*

11.72%

5Y*

8.20%

10Y*

6.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEMDX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FEMDX vs. EELDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMDX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMDX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMDX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMDX is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMDX is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMDX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EELDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EELDX is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EELDX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EELDX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EELDX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EELDX is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EELDX is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FEMDX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FEMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMDX and EELDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FEMDX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

FEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than EELDX's 8.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FEMDX
Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund
4.52%4.65%3.12%9.31%1.52%0.00%7.29%8.06%4.29%0.69%6.04%9.16%
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
8.44%8.63%9.07%9.15%7.89%7.69%7.87%8.13%7.87%4.12%1.65%3.98%

Drawdowns

FEMDX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.81%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMDX and EELDX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FEMDX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Debt Opportunities Fund (FEMDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...