PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDD vs. EXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDD vs. EXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDD achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than EXE's -13.81% return.


EDD

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.55%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
5.50%
ALL TIME*
2.96%

EXE

1D
1.74%
1M
4.98%
6M
-15.39%
YTD
-13.81%
1Y
-7.38%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.10M$3.03M$2.42M
$371.17M$368.49M$332.29M

EDD vs. EXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
14.80%32.46%8.64%14.09%-14.15%-5.83%
EXE
Expand Energy Corp
-13.81%14.35%33.18%-14.77%62.34%53.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EDD and EXE is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021

0.15

The correlation between EDD and EXE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDD vs. EXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EDD
EDD Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EXE
EXE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EDD vs. EXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) and Expand Energy Corp (EXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDDEXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.98

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.26

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

-0.48

+5.51

EDD vs. EXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the EXE Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDD and EXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDD vs. EXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDD drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, which is greater than EXE's maximum drawdown of -29.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDD and EXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDDEXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-29.69%

-29.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-28.43%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.67%

-28.43%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.04%

-29.69%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-22.60%

+19.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-11.35%

-12.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

15.54%

-10.04%

Volatility

EDD vs. EXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) is 4.62%, while Expand Energy Corp (EXE) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that EDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDDEXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

8.78%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

21.67%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

30.55%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

34.89%

-19.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

34.64%

-16.98%

Dividends

EDD vs. EXE - Dividend Comparison

EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than EXE's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund
10.82%9.76%11.45%7.30%6.82%6.93%6.92%8.15%9.90%8.18%10.32%12.65%
EXE
Expand Energy Corp
3.39%2.89%2.45%4.70%10.16%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDD and EXE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXE has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to EDD (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDD dropped -59.38% vs EXE's -29.69%.

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDD and EXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer