PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ED vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ED vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed USMV with an annualized return of 7.01%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


ED

1D
0.84%
1M
1.49%
YTD
10.24%
6M
12.27%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
7.01%

USMV

1D
0.43%
1M
1.84%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.34%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ED vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
10.24%15.15%1.55%-1.12%15.65%22.96%-16.99%22.54%-6.62%19.30%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.43%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ED and USMV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between ED and USMV has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ED vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ED
ED Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ED Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ED Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ED Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ED Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ED vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

0.62

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

2.06

-0.47

ED vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ED Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ED and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ED vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.90%

-33.10%

-45.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-6.46%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-9.36%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-17.93%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

-33.10%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-1.40%

-4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-2.87%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

1.95%

+2.64%

Volatility

ED vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.70%. This indicates that ED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

2.70%

+3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

6.02%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

8.56%

+8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

12.36%

+6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

14.51%

+6.50%

Dividends

ED vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than USMV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.23%3.42%3.72%3.56%3.32%3.63%4.23%3.27%3.74%3.25%3.64%4.05%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


ED and USMV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ED has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ED dropped -78.90% vs USMV's -33.10%.

USMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ED and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer