PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECOW vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECOW vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ECOW having a 13.10% return and SPEM slightly lower at 12.45%.


ECOW

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.29%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

SPEM

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.20%
YTD
12.45%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECOW vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.10%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%-2.51%10.37%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
12.45%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ECOW and SPEM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.73

The correlation between ECOW and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECOW vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECOW
SPEM

Communication Services

18.4%
7.2%

Energy

16.1%
4.7%

Industrials

15.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
10.4%

Technology

9.8%
28.2%

Basic Materials

9.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
3.9%

Utilities

7.9%
2.8%

Healthcare

1.6%
4.0%

Financial Services

-

20.2%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Communication Services

ECOW
18.4%
SPEM
7.2%

Energy

ECOW
16.1%
SPEM
4.7%

Industrials

ECOW
15.5%
SPEM
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ECOW
12.5%
SPEM
10.4%

Technology

ECOW
9.8%
SPEM
28.2%

Basic Materials

ECOW
9.6%
SPEM
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

ECOW
8.5%
SPEM
3.9%

Utilities

ECOW
7.9%
SPEM
2.8%

Healthcare

ECOW
1.6%
SPEM
4.0%

Financial Services

ECOW

-

SPEM
20.2%

Real Estate

ECOW

-

SPEM
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECOW vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECOW vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECOWSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

2.77

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

10.14

+5.25

ECOW vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECOW and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECOWSPEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.98

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.23

+0.14

Drawdowns

ECOW vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOWSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-64.41%

+24.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-11.36%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-17.62%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.67%

-31.88%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-1.40%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-14.75%

+3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.10%

-0.80%

Volatility

ECOW vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) is 4.66%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that ECOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOWSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

5.69%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

13.29%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

15.92%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

17.13%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

18.80%

+1.33%

ECOW vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECOW vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than SPEM's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.60%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.47%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECOW and SPEM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to ECOW (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 5-year performance, ECOW leads with 6.12% vs 5.70% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ECOW has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.47% for SPEM.

ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.11% for SPEM.

ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECOW and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer