PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECOW vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECOW vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECOW achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return.


ECOW

1D
-1.50%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.29%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECOW vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.10%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%-2.51%10.37%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ECOW and EDIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.68

The correlation between ECOW and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ECOW vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ECOW
EDIV

Communication Services

18.4%
13.8%

Energy

16.1%
3.2%

Industrials

15.5%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.8%

Technology

9.8%
8.4%

Basic Materials

9.6%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
12.8%

Utilities

7.9%
2.5%

Healthcare

1.6%
1.3%

Financial Services

-

29.7%

Real Estate

-

5.1%

Communication Services

ECOW
18.4%
EDIV
13.8%

Energy

ECOW
16.1%
EDIV
3.2%

Industrials

ECOW
15.5%
EDIV
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ECOW
12.5%
EDIV
11.8%

Technology

ECOW
9.8%
EDIV
8.4%

Basic Materials

ECOW
9.6%
EDIV
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

ECOW
8.5%
EDIV
12.8%

Utilities

ECOW
7.9%
EDIV
2.5%

Healthcare

ECOW
1.6%
EDIV
1.3%

Financial Services

ECOW

-

EDIV
29.7%

Real Estate

ECOW

-

EDIV
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECOW vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECOW vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECOWEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.22

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.37

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

4.23

+11.16

ECOW vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECOW and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECOWEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.16

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.78

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.17

+0.21

Drawdowns

ECOW vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECOW drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECOW and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECOWEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-53.36%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-10.36%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-13.84%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.67%

-28.32%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-4.07%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.07%

-19.36%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.34%

-1.04%

Volatility

ECOW vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that ECOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECOWEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

4.11%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

10.03%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

12.19%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

13.83%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

17.49%

+2.64%

ECOW vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECOW has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECOW vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.60%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECOW and EDIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECOW has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECOW dropped -40.27% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 10.66% vs 6.12% for ECOW. On fees, EDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 4.50% for EDIV.

ECOW tracks Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ECOW and 0.49% for EDIV.

ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECOW and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer