ECON vs. IEMG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ECON tracks the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index while IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ECON returned 4.44%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for IEMG. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ECON charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

ECON vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ECON has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 4.44%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.84% annualized return.

ECON

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: 12.59%
• YTD: 22.39%
• 1Y: 41.96%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 4.44%
• ALL TIME*: 4.32%

IEMG

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -2.79%
• 6M: 7.82%
• YTD: 16.38%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 8.84%
• ALL TIME*: 6.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	$293.78K	$337.49K	$633.44K
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	$833.06M	$972.69M	$1.09B

ECON vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	22.39%	34.15%	0.22%	7.51%	-16.00%	-14.11%	20.83%	17.22%	-26.87%	27.46%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	16.38%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and IEMG is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.92

The correlation between ECON and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECON vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECON	IEMG
Technology	43.6%	43.6%
Financial Services	21.9%	17.3%
Industrials	6.4%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	7.7%
Communication Services	5.3%	5.6%
Basic Materials	5.0%	5.8%
Energy	3.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	3.0%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.8%
Utilities	1.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.5%

Return for Risk

ECON vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ECON

ECON Risk / Return Rank: 70
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 60
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ECON vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECON	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.35	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.85	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.33	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.12	7.16	+0.96

ECON vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECON vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECON	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.37%	-38.71%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.13%	-13.78%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-17.21%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.93%	-33.61%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.37%	-38.71%	-6.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.91%	-9.76%	-2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.55%	-12.89%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	4.47%	+0.57%

Volatility

ECON vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 8.73%. This indicates that ECON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECON	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	8.73%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.43%	21.74%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.54%	23.71%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	19.27%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	20.32%	+1.01%

ECON vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECON vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than IEMG's 2.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	1.45%	1.77%	0.76%	1.57%	2.06%	1.08%	0.63%	1.68%	0.98%	0.35%	0.74%	1.10%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.32%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECON and IEMG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ECON and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ECON or IEMG?

ECON has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to IEMG (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

Which ETF is better, ECON or IEMG?

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 8.84% vs 4.44% for ECON. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECON or IEMG?

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECON or IEMG?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECON or IEMG?

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.45% for ECON.

What is the main difference between ECON and IEMG?

ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.09% for IEMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.