ECON vs. EMCS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ECON tracks the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index while EMCS tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ECON returned 6.68%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for EMCS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ECON charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.

Performance

ECON vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 31.82% return, which is significantly higher than EMCS's 30.08% return.

ECON

• 1D: -5.13%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 31.82%
• 6M: 32.29%
• 1Y: 58.08%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: 6.38%

EMCS

• 1D: -6.03%
• 1M: 5.49%
• YTD: 30.08%
• 6M: 31.16%
• 1Y: 55.24%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECON vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	31.82%	34.15%	0.22%	7.51%	-16.00%	-14.11%	20.83%	17.22%	-3.42%
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	30.08%	38.71%	10.12%	5.68%	-23.58%	-2.02%	19.72%	19.54%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and EMCS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.92

The correlation between ECON and EMCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ECON vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ECON	EMCS
Technology	44.0%	50.7%
Financial Services	20.5%	26.0%
Industrials	6.7%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	9.1%
Basic Materials	5.5%	2.6%
Communication Services	5.3%	7.4%
Energy	3.5%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	0.0%
Healthcare	2.6%	0.0%
Utilities	1.8%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

ECON vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON

ECON Risk / Return Rank: 82
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EMCS

EMCS Risk / Return Rank: 75
EMCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EMCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMCS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EMCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EMCS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ECON	EMCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.19	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	2.77	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.41	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	3.88	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	14.31	+0.87

ECON vs. EMCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the EMCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and EMCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ECON vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, roughly equal to the maximum EMCS drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and EMCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ECON	EMCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.37%	-44.86%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-14.32%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.37%	-16.73%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.08%	-42.06%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.13%	-6.03%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-16.52%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	3.87%	-0.03%

Volatility

ECON vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS) have volatilities of 13.47% and 14.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ECON	EMCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.47%	14.09%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.31%	23.01%	-1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.50%	25.41%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	21.33%	-0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.23%	22.04%	-0.81%

ECON vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ECON vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than EMCS's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF	1.34%	1.77%	0.76%	1.57%	2.06%	1.08%	0.63%	1.68%	0.98%	0.35%	0.74%	1.10%
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF	1.46%	1.66%	0.67%	3.07%	2.26%	1.46%	1.40%	3.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ECON and EMCS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ECON and EMCS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ECON or EMCS?

EMCS has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to ECON (13.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs EMCS's -44.86%.

Which ETF is better, ECON or EMCS?

On 5-year performance, EMCS leads with 7.51% vs 6.68% for ECON. On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ECON has been the lower-risk option at 13.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ECON or EMCS?

Over the 5-year period, EMCS has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ECON or EMCS?

EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ECON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ECON or EMCS?

EMCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.34% for ECON.

What is the main difference between ECON and EMCS?

ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while EMCS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.15% for EMCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.