PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECON vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ECON vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 36.71% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ECON has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 6.24%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


ECON

1D
1.28%
1M
14.62%
YTD
36.71%
6M
39.84%
1Y
67.91%
3Y*
24.38%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
6.24%

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECON vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
36.71%34.15%0.22%7.51%-16.00%-14.11%20.83%17.22%-26.87%27.46%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ECON and DBE is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.26

The correlation between ECON and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECON vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECON
ECON Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ECON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECON Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECON Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ECON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECON Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECON vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ECONDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.36

2.37

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.31

2.91

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.39

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

6.10

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.79

11.98

+6.81

ECON vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ECON Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ECON and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ECONDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

2.37

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.66

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.42

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.09

+0.15

Drawdowns

ECON vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECONDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.37%

-86.69%

+41.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-14.41%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-23.89%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-38.74%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.37%

-60.84%

+15.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-31.85%

+31.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.65%

-57.31%

+40.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

7.34%

-3.67%

Volatility

ECON vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) is 8.95%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that ECON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECONDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

13.47%

-4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.60%

30.80%

-13.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.33%

35.02%

-14.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

29.37%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

28.33%

-7.30%

ECON vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ECON vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DBE's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ECON
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF
1.30%1.77%0.76%1.57%2.06%1.08%0.63%1.68%0.98%0.35%0.74%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ECON and DBE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to ECON (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 11.78% vs 6.24% for ECON. On fees, ECON is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ECON has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 6.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ECON is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.30% for ECON.

ECON is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. ECON tracks Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.78% for DBE.

ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECON and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer