ECON vs. CAOS
ECON (Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ECON is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Emerging Markets Consumer Titans Index, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. ECON is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECON returned 17.39%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for CAOS. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ECON charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
ECON vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECON achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
ECON
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 22.39%
- 1Y
- 41.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $293.78K | $337.49K | $633.44K |
ECON vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 22.39% | 34.15% | 0.22% | 3.73% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECON and CAOS is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ECON and CAOS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECON vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
ECON
CAOS
ECON vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECON | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.47 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 5.45 | +2.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECON vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECON drawdown since its inception was -45.37%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECON and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECON | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.37% | -3.89% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | -0.76% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -3.60% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -1.13% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -0.92% | -15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.04% | 0.34% | +4.70% |
Volatility
ECON vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF (ECON) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that ECON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECON | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 0.51% | +9.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.43% | 1.07% | +22.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 1.57% | +23.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 4.18% | +16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 4.18% | +17.15% |
ECON vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECON has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECON vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
ECON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ECON Columbia Emerging Markets Consumer ETF | 1.45% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.57% | 2.06% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.35% | 0.74% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECON and CAOS have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECON has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECON dropped -45.37% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, ECON leads with 17.39% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, ECON is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ECON has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ECON is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
ECON has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
ECON is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ECON and 0.63% for CAOS.
ECON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECON and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer