ECML vs. VIOV
ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) and VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ECML is actively managed, while VIOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ECML returned 15.57%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for VIOV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ECML charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VIOV.
Performance
ECML vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECML achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly lower than VIOV's 15.28% return.
ECML
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
ECML vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 14.39% | 6.82% | 2.37% | 24.36% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECML and VIOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ECML and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
ECML vs. VIOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ECML
VIOV
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
ECML
VIOV
Healthcare
ECML
VIOV
Industrials
ECML
VIOV
Energy
ECML
VIOV
Consumer Defensive
ECML
VIOV
Basic Materials
ECML
VIOV
Technology
ECML
VIOV
Communication Services
ECML
VIOV
Utilities
ECML
VIOV
Financial Services
ECML
-
VIOV
Real Estate
ECML
-
VIOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECML vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank
ECML
VIOV
ECML vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ECML | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 3.99 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.05 | 13.00 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ECML | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.03 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.53 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
ECML vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECML drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECML and VIOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECML | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -47.36% | +22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -9.33% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.66% | -28.44% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -1.28% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -7.38% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.86% | -0.42% |
Volatility
ECML vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is 3.84%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ECML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECML | VIOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 4.54% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 11.57% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 18.41% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 21.95% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 23.89% | -5.50% |
ECML vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ECML has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ECML vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison
ECML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than VIOV's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 1.20% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECML and VIOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ECML (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECML dropped -24.66% vs VIOV's -47.36%.
On 3-year performance, ECML leads with 15.57% vs 14.29% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ECML has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ECML has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 14.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.
They also come from different issuers: Euclidean and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ECML and 0.10% for VIOV.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECML and VIOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer