PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ECHO vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ECHO vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EchoStar Corporation (ECHO) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ECHO

1D
0.65%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LRCX

1D
5.46%
1M
36.29%
YTD
153.62%
6M
149.83%
1Y
347.64%
3Y*
90.60%
5Y*
48.45%
10Y*
50.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ECHO vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ECHO and LRCX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2026

0.31

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ECHO vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ECHO vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EchoStar Corporation (ECHO) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ECHOLRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

57.95

ECHO vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ECHO vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ECHO drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECHO and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ECHOLRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-87.90%

+81.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

0.00%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-28.14%

+24.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

Volatility

ECHO vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ECHOLRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.51%

55.68%

-13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.51%

47.34%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.51%

45.29%

-2.78%

Dividends

ECHO vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

ECHO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHO
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.24%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%

Financials

ECHO vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EchoStar Corporation and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
5.84B
(ECHO) Total Revenue
(LRCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ECHO and LRCX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ECHO and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer